T1B

Posted: **Wed Aug 10, 2005 5:40 am**

Quite possibly the worst team in MLB history. Blow a 7-2 lead in the 9th tonight by giving up 11 runs in the 9th to Cleveland, 8 after two were out? And this after 16-1 and 11-0 beatings by Oakland Sat. and Sun.? And all of this AT HOME????

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

Posted: **Wed Aug 10, 2005 7:34 am**

The chick on Letterman has some damn nice legs but she is dumb as a stump.

Posted: **Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:00 am**

e wrote:local sports radio drama queen kevin keitzman just today asked if the real royals lie somewhere between the high he felt a couple years ago when the royals lead the central for half the season or the low he was feeling this afternoon after last night's game. it appears that his answer is a resounding "no." this team's even worse than he thought it was.

You know what's even worse than that?

Oklahoma "sports talk radio." Jesus Christ. Keitzman is like a godsend compared to these clueless fuckstains, especially when they start meandering off into the uncharted territory -- that outside of OU recruiting (1-7 years in advance) and occasional OSU myopia, mind you -- the uncharted territory, of gasp professional sports, i.e. anything outside of the state of Oklahoma.

Seriously, between Tulsa and OKC (with OKC having a "Sports Animal" affiliate in a Tulsa suburb), if anyone wants to know anything relevant about a professional sports team or player, outside of the common news, you can seriously learn more from a message board like this.

That's how bad it is, and I'm not kidding.

Only 4 more weeks to go until CF starts, and Sirius radio kicks in for real. Thank God.

Posted: **Fri Aug 12, 2005 8:51 am**

Toddwoods wrote:The Yanks are in a Wildcard hunt. I like their chances.

Posted: **Sat Aug 13, 2005 1:52 am**

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
Frank Football wrote:Retract The Royals
That's what I get for NOT reading the operator's manual....all of these years and I never knew the Royals were RETRACTABLE.

Caught that too, Paul...but didn't think anything that FF had to say about umm...anything, was really worth the effort to comment.

But since this IS the '85 Royals re-union weekend, the word is CONTRACTED, and Frank Football, as usual, can go fuck herself.

Posted: **Sat Aug 13, 2005 4:17 am**

Frank Football would like to contract his statement about retracting the Royals.
Signed-
Management

Posted: **Sat Aug 13, 2005 2:08 pm**

Posted: **Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:24 pm**

Kaley,

You become a Diamondback fan?

Posted: **Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:22 pm**

can they bring up Omaha and relegate KC?

Posted: **Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:40 am**

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
Adelpiero wrote:can they bring up Omaha and relegate KC?
They've already done that.

Sin,
2002

P.S.- They just lost their 15th straight, to the Tigers if ya need them.

The Tigers have ate it hard the last few weeks so I'll take a doubleheader sweep...even if it's against the worst team in baseball. Right now, the Tigers only goal is to finish at .500. There are rumblings that if the Tigers finish poorly, Trammell could be on the outs.

Posted: **Mon Aug 15, 2005 1:26 am**

The Royals problems aren't anything that a hard salary cap couldn't fix.

Just ask Gary Bettman.

Posted: **Mon Aug 15, 2005 2:59 am**

Not that I'm counting or that it matters, but it's only 15 Paul ya' fucking moron.

Posted: **Mon Aug 15, 2005 3:11 am**

Did Brad Porter apologize to you? If not, you better call him up and demand one.

Posted: **Mon Aug 15, 2005 3:33 am**

It'll be 16 tomorrow.

Felix Hernandez...

Posted: **Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:50 pm**

Maybe if the Royals started playing AAA teams they could reach .500.

Posted: **Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:53 pm**

Posted: **Wed Aug 17, 2005 9:35 pm**

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
Frank Football wrote:Retract The Royals
That's what I get for NOT reading the operator's manual....all of these years and I never knew the Royals were RETRACTABLE.

Most of it was written in some Arabic chicken-scratch scribble. I fukked that one up as well.

Posted: **Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:19 pm**

As bad as they are right now, at least they aren't on pace to be worse than the 2003 Tigers...

Posted: **Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:29 pm**

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
Frank Football wrote:Retract The Royals
That's what I get for NOT reading the operator's manual....all of these years and I never knew the Royals were RETRACTABLE.

4 entries found for retract.
re·tract ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-trkt)
v. re·tract·ed, re·tract·ing, re·tracts
v. tr.
To take back; disavow: refused to retract the statement.
To draw back or in: a plane retracting its landing gear. See Synonyms at recede1.
Linguistics.
To utter (a sound) with the tongue drawn back.
To draw back (the tongue).

v. intr.
To take something back or disavow it.
To draw back.

Posted: **Sun Aug 21, 2005 2:23 am**

Stick to Big Macs and saying coats make you look fat, Tubby.

Posted: **Sun Aug 21, 2005 1:42 pm**

Props to the Royals on ending their losing skid...I bet this news makes Rome very sad.

Posted: **Mon Aug 22, 2005 3:09 am**

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:I know you are, but what am I?

See Frank, I can go to the 1st grade smack card too.

Please kill yourself.

Go sleep it off, Fatso.

Posted: **Mon Aug 22, 2005 3:55 am**

Posted: **Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:23 am**

Posted: **Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:09 pm**

Bizzarofelice wrote:Maybe if the Royals started playing AAA teams they could reach .500.

They are a AAA team at this point and a helluva bad one at that. I'd say there's a good chance they're going to threaten the 120+ loss plateau.

T1B

Retract The Royals

Retract The Royals

Re: Retract The Royals

Re: Retract The Royals

Re: Retract The Royals