Page 1 of 1

Questions for trumpers and thumpers

Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2024 11:36 pm
by kcdave


I watched parts of this briefly this morning, and just watched
it completely, followed by checking out the authors profile.
Dude has some serious yam hatred and 40k followers.
Hat tip to him. He is a big old thumper talking
about shit that a happy agnostic such as myself neither
believes or gives a fuck about. However, there is no shortage
of believers and trumpers here. What do you jesus
folks think about this vid?

Re: Questions for trumpers and thumpers

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 1:13 am
by Softball Bat
I watched the video,dave.

Donald Trump is an antichrist.
He famously said in 2016 that he had never asked God for forgiveness.
He has never come close to making any kind of public statement about having accepted Jesus Christ as his Lord.
That is antichrist.

But I did not see anything presented in the video that should compel someone to think Donald is THE antichrist.

My perspective is that, among other things, THE antichrist will be a descendant of King David, which I do not believe Donald is.


I do think there are powers that be that might be wanting to present Donald as the antichrist.

Re: Questions for trumpers and thumpers

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 2:56 am
by L45B
Flump is definitely the motherfucking antichrist. He claims that God came down from the heavens and stopped the bullet from clipping his cerebellum however those of us leftists who are thinking of him every minute (like me, Diego and Screwy) and know how he thinks knows this:

The whole scene in Butler PA was completely staged with the help of Cheeto’l and Vince McMahon and Hulk Hogan and the Macho Man Randy Savage helping Dump pull off the act. Only an evil fascist anti-joy and anti-vibe Nazi Socialist member would stoop to this level of deception.


Re: Questions for trumpers and thumpers

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 2:58 am
by 88BuckeyeGrad
I once ordered Antichrist when I meant antipasto. I’ll never do that again.

Re: Questions for trumpers and thumpers

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 2:24 pm
by Mikey
Softball Bat wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2024 1:13 am I watched the video,dave.

Donald Trump is an antichrist.
He famously said in 2016 that he had never asked God for forgiveness.
He has never come close to making any kind of public statement about having accepted Jesus Christ as his Lord.
That is antichrist.

But I did not see anything presented in the video that should compel someone to think Donald is THE antichrist.

My perspective is that, among other things, THE antichrist will be a descendant of King David, which I do not believe Donald is.


I do think there are powers that be that might be wanting to present Donald as the antichrist.
Have you forgotten?

Image


Image

Re: Questions for trumpers and thumpers

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 6:11 pm
by bungle clone
Do consider that if the tard narrating the vid could just think much beyond gnat cognition, then he would be able to see that he counters his own bile against 45 by coming up with the scenario that is in effect an exercise in reductio ad absurdum*. It's just that Trump's suuuuuuuch a bumbling fool that he can't even get anti-christing done right, I imagine. Well, what I mean is that whole thing about appointing judges who did sumpin' mean and bad to Roe v Wade... that made it so the whole abortion deal is harder to do in some states now and more pending...just some lame anti-christin' going on. I dunno. Jesus reputedly loves babies, the mirror universe version is supposably a colleague of Moloch, which Trump is failing at being. Can we get someone who's well connected to Hell to send us a replacement?

Yeah, the question is addressed to Trumpers and thumpers, and I'm neither. Philosophy is my thing, and as such would revel in watching the dumbshit who came up with the vid get roundly ground into a fine mist whilst being informed about his crimes against logic. It's bad enuff that fukking retard is going wack, worse that our own kcdave thinks it has any merit.





*Here's how it works:
1 Assume that a position is true for the sake of argument
2 Demonstrate that the position leads to logical contradictions
3 Argue that the thesis must be accepted because its rejection would be untenable