T1B

Oh fuck

Did she have tits?

I could never tell.

Perhaps the civil war begins now

It already started Buttfuck Bill, try to keep up.

Hope you enjoy your shit sandwich.

So is Donny and Mitch gonna Jan another justice down the dems throat?

Hope so.

They’d do the same if they had the chance.

I suspect he’ll drop a name this coming week.

The dems will cry, but who fukking cares?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:59 am So is Donny and Mitch gonna Jan another justice down the dems throat?

Yes. They have to. Plus I'm sure it will be good for another round of rioting and blue city burning. Win-win.

mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:18 am

smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:59 am So is Donny and Mitch gonna Jan another justice down the dems throat?

Yes. They have to. Plus I'm sure it will be good for another round of rioting and blue city burning. Win-win.

Have to.
Like Pedokkkal has to run for cover for weeks at a time.

Civil War: translation, if we can’t kill people and fuck them over anymore then we will just burn the place down.

schmick wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:28 am Ding dong the cunt is dead....

Hope she is putting lipstick on Helen Thomas in hell

You are both yellow and orange.

Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 5:20 am

Have to.
Like Pedokkkal has to run for cover for weeks at a time.

Weeks ?


He moved to Nebraska 12 years ago.


Like all Trumpers... he's a complete faliure.

After what happened to Garland, if the Nazis push thru a Justice and the Ds take the WH and Senate it is time to pack the court. I think we need 12 oracles.

Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:54 pm After what happened to Garland, if the Nazis push thru a Justice and the Ds take the WH and Senate it is time to pack the court. I think we need 12 oracles.

Don't forget statehood for DC and Puerto Rico.

PR statehood could be a thing.

DC would take a Constitutional Amendment.

I believe the same applies to court packing.

If you fukk a want to keep Justices on your end of the bench, how about you tell them when it’s time to hang it up.

If RBG cared about anything other than holding onto power for as long as she could, she’d have stepped down in about 2014. That would have assured another commie in her spot.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:42 pm If you fukk a want to keep Justices on your end of the bench, how about you tell them when it’s time to hang it up.

If RBG cared about anything other than holding onto power for as long as she could, she’d have stepped down in about 2014. That would have assured another commie in her spot.

I am taking a lot of shit on another board for saying exactly this. Apparently you're not a good liberal if you say this.

smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:42 pm PR statehood could be a thing.

They would need the White House and filibuster proof majority in the Senate. So...pretty fucking unlikely assuming PR even wants to become a state.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 5:28 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:42 pm If you fukk a want to keep Justices on your end of the bench, how about you tell them when it’s time to hang it up.

If RBG cared about anything other than holding onto power for as long as she could, she’d have stepped down in about 2014. That would have assured another commie in her spot.

I am taking a lot of shit on another board for saying exactly this. Apparently you're not a good liberal if you say this.

3rd

mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:21 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:42 pm PR statehood could be a thing.

They would need the White House and filibuster proof majority in the Senate. So...pretty fucking unlikely assuming PR even wants to become a state.

Now yeah but that might change pretty quick.

Huckleberry was on Fox this morning and summed up the whole situation pretty well.

The republicans are gonna jam another Justice up the dems ass for one simple reason.

Because they can.

And anyone who pretends that the Dems wouldn't do the same, were the situation reversed is completely full of shit.

He also pointed out that this all goes back to Harry Reid.

HE was the one who wiped his ass with the filibuster rule to stuff Obamacare up the Republican's shitpipe. HE set the precedent so the dems get to live with the consequences.

As for the Dems saying "If you do this, we'll stack the court", does anyone with a shred of brain activity not think the dems will do that and anything else they can get away with, anyway.

The bottom line here is that the Republicans are playing by the rules and using them to their full advantage. Compare this to the shameless attempted coup which is dems started 5 minutes after the election.

Fukk you assholes. The D is gonna win another one against you chumps.

It's kinda nice to see that you finally realized that your best game plan, healfcare and AGW is the way to go, so you are running back to it. But it's too late. Enough people in the middle are on to your attempted race war and other despicable shit. A lot of balck folks are tired of it and they don't give two fukks about AGW. They just want the cops to show up again in their neighborhood to get a handle on the out of control thugs.

smackaholic wrote:The bottom line here is that the Republicans are playing by the rules and using them to their full advantage. Compare this to the shameless attempted coup which is dems started 5 minutes after the election.

How fascinating!


Turn off FAUX NEWS.

Take back your mind.


Give it a shot.

There’s nothing in the Constitution that requires a certain number of Justices on the S.C. Right now 13 seems like a pretty good number.

Has anyone seen a picture of suckoholic's wife ?

If so, abortion would be obsolete.

One of the scariest heifers I've ever seen.

Wife smack from you?

I'll take that as a compliment.

Let's see a pic of yours.

Wonder if the Mrs Fiatlux is a left or right hand?

Mikey wrote:There’s nothing in the Constitution that requires a certain number of Justices on the S.C. Right now 13 seems like a pretty good number.

So anyone can just bump it up to get their majority then?

Is there anything you Marxists won’t do to get control?

Can they decide there are too many and shitcan a few?

All of this could have been avoided had the filibuster rule not been fukked with.

Thanks Harry.

Looks like it’s mob rule from here on out, I guess, until these gangsters gain enough of a hold to stop pretending to be dictators and make it official.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You really should be tested for a serious case of myopia.

I’m not generally in favor of “packing” the SC but, if your Dear Leader and his chelonian little Caporegime succeed in ramming this appointment through, it would be completely justified and I hope they do it.

Now that the Dumpster has heard of the concept, likely for the first time, I expect he’s probably trying to figure out a way to do it himself. If the knuckledraggers somehow keep the White House and their Senate majority I fully expect him to start pushing appointment of a couple dozen Tom Cotton clones by the end of November.

smackaholic wrote:Wonder if the Mrs Fiatlux is a left or right hand?

A few years ago I caught a look at my dick in the mirror and noticed it was browned up on one side. Wtf? I realized I had been flogging myself so much that I built up a permanent bruise. I said then and there that I needed to even it out. I mean, what if I had to go to the doctor and he asked me why my dick was brown only on one side?

So even though it was uncomfortable, I started shanking myself with the other hand for a while. Then after I while I changed the rotation so that Monday is a right hand jerk day. Tuesday is a left hand jerk day. And so on. Now my dick is brownish all over and it looks like the dick of a Mexican. But it is all the same color so I am cool with that.

I know how to problem solve.

Rack you Slap, for figuring it out.

I have become pretty good at switch hitting myself since the advent of free interwebs pron.

I find that left handed dick beating is easier than LH mouse/keyboard clacking.

Hell, it’s gotten to the point that i have to going southpaw no longer feels like someone else is jerking it.

How many other switch hitters we got in the house?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

smackaholic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:13 am And anyone who pretends that the Dems wouldn't do the same, were the situation reversed is completely full of shit.

You are an idiot. There is no reversing this. The D’s would have voted on the R’s “Garland” and this whole situation would never have happened. More evidence of this will be supplied in the future when the D’s roll over for their corporate masters yet again and don’t block RBG’s seatholder from being a Dumpster and then don’t pack the courts if given a chance.
They should threaten to add Her to the court when they pack it.

smackaholic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 1:32 pm

Mikey wrote:There’s nothing in the Constitution that requires a certain number of Justices on the S.C. Right now 13 seems like a pretty good number.

So anyone can just bump it up to get their majority then?

Is there anything you Marxists won’t do to get control?

Yes that is the rules which you just said were ok for the R’s but the other side is Marxists who will do anything to gain power.
Fuck you you stupid orange fuck.

But...but...but

Harry Reid!!!

Obaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!

Benghaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

schmick wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 9:26 pm It's the President and the senate who appoint the judges, yes or no?

Republicans have the White House and the Senate, yes or no?



"Elections have consequences" yes or no?

Allegedly...

sin 2016

So you won't have a problem with the new Democratic President and Senate appointing another four to the Supreme Court next year?

Shedick has no idea how the Constitution works. He just knows he is a scared little cuck and the Faux Blonde told him it’s because of pinkos.

They would have the right to expand the court if they choose to.

Problem would be eliminated if they term limited the mother fuckers instead of waiting until they are a stinking senile corpse sitting on the bench. Male or female.

The idea of 87 year olds or older making SCOTUS decisions is ludicrous.

smackaholic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 11:56 am Wife smack from you?

I'll take that as a compliment.

Let's see a pic of yours.

Wonder if the Mrs Fiatlux is a left or right hand?

Assuming he rolls that way. Probably is just jonesing for some head off Queerland or Screwy so they can sing the praises of Biden Octoberfest style.

Derron wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 3:51 am Problem would be eliminated if they term limited the mother fuckers instead of waiting until they are a stinking senile corpse sitting on the bench. Male or female.

The idea of 87 year olds or older making SCOTUS decisions is ludicrous.

Absolutely

I think we can find some bipartisanship in the idea of senile people in important government roles.

It's a shame the dems are running one for the top spot.

It would be nice if we could have a little bit of sanity and carved in stone rules.

Here are a few.....

Retirement age of 70....,.for all federal elected officials.

All nominees presented by the Prez get a speedy vote within 2 weeks of pic. No more Kavanaugh witch hunt shit shows.

70 votes needed for first nominee. Lower numbers for 2nd or 3rd in the event that the minority party thinks it can simply veto everyone. Of course, the majority party could play cute with such a rule by intentionally voting against initial pics, so this gets a little tricky.

9 justices. No more.

The idea that the ruling party can simply pack their way to a majority is stupid. We've been pretty good at avoiding, other than that time FDR thought he'd pack his way to a socialist utopia.

It's time for a Constitutional Convention to settle this and a few other things that have been debated forever such as WTF does "regulated militia" mean or the horrible Roe V Wade decision.

BTW, if you bother to read Roe, it's actually a pretty sensible compromise.

Would have made a good law. But Judges aren't supposed to make laws. They are supposed to follow them.

And last but not least, we need to move the 10th Amendment up a little in the rankings to maybe 3. If we simply start following it, fully, we might find that we could stop this coming civil war over who is in charge, because it really wouldn't matter much.

DC's role could get back to international affairs and not a hell of a lot else.

You want single payer?

Do it at the state or local level.

Wanna build a buncha fukkin' bird killers or magic shade trees?

The same applies.

Mikey wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 2:54 am They would have the right to expand the court if they choose to.

And when Republicans take back control, they would have the right to shrink the court. LIFO.

Yeah, it's a pretty stupid game to play and that's assuming you will even be in a position to play it.

Roach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:33 pmSo here is to a beautiful woman.

I would have buttered Ruth Bader's ass crack back in that day.

Kierland wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:27 pm They should threaten to add Her to the court when they pack it.

Fuck yeah

mvscal wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:55 am

Mikey wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 2:54 am They would have the right to expand the court if they choose to.

And when Republicans take back control, they would have the right to shrink the court. LIFO.

Yeah, it's a pretty stupid game to play and that's assuming you will even be in a position to play it.

Says the guy sucking the dick of the turtle that fired the first shot. Get used to every R POTUS being impeached you kid diddling weirdo.

schmick wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 7:09 pm

We get it 88 you live on 8chan now.