The fact she runs some filter over it and you see different objects really means nothing. Maybe NASA ran parts thru sharpening filters. Just because there are squares and dots proves nothing. Now if she was the programmer who wrote the software then she would have some credibility.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote:
I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
No we aren't getting anywhere. My previous post was completely ignored. Par for the course here, but still. Nor were any of my previous questions addressed.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote:
I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Nice call WW, that song and others from that album still stand the test of time.
Poptart, you never answered my question so why should I follow you as you move the goal posts?
I will offer an olive branch though. In that derivation you provided on the previous page where does it go off the rails? You appear to have missed a major point.
Left Seater wrote:No we aren't getting anywhere. My previous post was completely ignored. Par for the course here, but still. Nor were any of my previous questions addressed.
Your previous post was directly addressed.
No, your previous smorgasbord of questions were rightfully IGNORED, because you are behaving like a -----> child.
'tard, I posted HER videos so we could discuss what SHE talked about.
She didn't talk about sunsets, 24 hour sunlight, southern flights, or circumnavigating Antarctica.
atmdad wrote:Nice call WW, that song and others from that album still stand the test of time.
Poptart, you never answered my question so why should I follow you as you move the goal posts?
I will offer an olive branch though. In that derivation you provided on the previous page where does it go off the rails? You appear to have missed a major point.
adad wrote:I asked if you knew what the definition of curvature is. Obviously you don't.
Obviously?
If your eyes are at water level and you are viewing a mountain which 1 kilometer (39,370 inches) in height, all of that mountain will sink below the horizon due to --> CURVATURE <-- when you move 70.14 miles (112.88 kilo) away from the mountain.
It's self-explanatory.
(This is not talking about atmospheric conditions or effect. It is talking strictly about EARTH CURVATURE on YOUR globe model.)
8 (inch per mile, approx) x 70.14 x 70.14 = 39,357 inches
Vogel wrote:Over a distance of 70.14 miles (112.88 kilo), earth curvature is 39,370 inches (1 Kilo).
Since adad posted Scripture, I want to once again briefly speak to my brothers in Christ about this topic.
Understand, I NEVER speak about "flat earth" with anyone in my day-to-day life.
The reaction to it seen on this board -----> is why.
People flip out and absolutely lose all ability to hear or reason.
It's a detriment to spreading the Gospel.
So despite knowing what I know, I don't talk about it.
But since this board is a different environment, a no-hold's-barred free-for-all (sort of) stop on the interweb, I have spoken of it here.
You brothers better know some things...
The Bible very plainly and directly (much of it in the very first book of Genesis) tells us...
- the earth is stationary (can not move)
- the earth is flat (or something very close to that)
- the earth is covered by a firmament
- contained within the firmament are the sun, moon, and stars
- sun, moon, and stars move in a circuit above the stationary earth
- above the firmament are waters
Again, this is not obscure information.
It is what is directly relayed to us in God's Word.
Famous Hebrew scholar Dr. Michael Heiser (a Christian) verifies that this is indeed what the Bible tells us.
And you need not be anything close to a Hebrew scholar to understand it.
You simply need to be able to read English.
Watch the video - especially the 2nd half of it.
Heiser's position on this is, "Yeah, the Bible definitely does say these things. But it is wrong."
lol
He says that God did not care if the authors of the Bible got it wrong -- because it does not really matter.
It's a pretty incredible take, but... he's not the only one who has this take.
Dr. Heiser got into a massive war on his blog with "flat earthers" who came there and got into a debate with him about it.
He melted and banned them from the blog, and then banned any flat earth talk.
He can't handle the truth.
He's not alone, sadly.
The Bible tells us directly about the world God created for us.
What it says is clear.
NASA (proven liars and deceivers) have convinced you otherwise, by showing you phony pictures and telling you grande and epic tales.
And Hollyweird (etc.) has done it's job to reinforce it.
Visual Line of Sight Calculations dependent on Earth's Curvature
by David Senesac
How does one calculate a visual line of sight for objects at a given height that are distant enough that the Earth's curvature
needs to be considered? Why might a photographer find such information useful? Some examples of what one might want to
know: Whether or not a distant mountain can be seen from the top of another mountain. By how many degrees the rising full
moon will be blocked by a distant mountain range in order to estimate whether it might be bathed in warm sunset light. Whether
an alpine lake will catch sunset alpenglow or be blocked by a nearby ridge to the west.
The Earth has a radius of approximately 3965 miles. Using the Pythagorean theorem, that calculates to an average curvature of
7.98 inches per mile or approximately 8 inches per mile (squared)...
Question:
How can I find the curvature per mile of the earths surface? What is it?
Thanks
Hi again Robert,
Suppose that the earth is a sphere of radius 3963 miles. If you are at a point P on the earth's surface and move tangent to the surface a distance of 1 mile then you can form a right angled triangel as in the diagram. Using the theorem of Pythagoras a2 = 39632 + 12 = 15705370 and thus a = 3963.000126 miles. Thus your position is 3963.000126 - 3963 = 0.000126 miles above the surface of the earth. 0.000126 miles = 12*5280*0.000126 = 7.98 inches. Hence the earth's surface curves approximately 8 inches in one mile. Look at our response to Shirley to see what happens after the first mile.
In April 2004 we received an message from Jerry, a retired Engineer, who pointed out an error in my solution above. What follows is a slightly edited version of what Jerry sent.
It is true that Harley showed quite correctly that the earth curves approximately 8 inches in one mile. The solution presented then goes on to find out over how many miles does the earth curve 72 inches or 6 feet. Then this distance is doubled which is required (and would be easy to forget), because each man looks this distance to his horizon, where the line of sight is tangent to the earth's surface midway between them. All of this reasoning is correct so far.
However, it turns out that while the earth does curve 8 inches in one mile, it does not take 9 miles to curve 72 inches. To show this, let us return to the Pythagorean Theorem method used by Harley, but using 6 feet for the curvature. Here is a copy of Harley's diagram with the 1 in the diagram replaced by x, since in this case the distance is unknown.
Again, using the theorem of Pythagoras
a2 = 39632 + x2 = 15705369 + x2
Solving for x,
x2 = a2 - 15705369
a must be 3963 miles + 6 feet (Let's say the men are actually 6'3", so their eyes are six feet above ground.). Thus
a = 3963.001136 miles
x2 = 15705378 - 15705369 = 9
x = 3 miles
Now, remember that each man looks 3 miles to the horizon, giving their distance from each other as 6 miles.
This shows that at eye level of 6 ft. the horizon is 3 miles (at sea or on a level plain).*
A rule-of-thumb for line of sight problems such as this, where the distance is small in comparison to the size of the earth is
c = (2/3) times x2, where x is distance in miles and c is curvature in feet.
For the problem at hand, we then have x2 = (3/2)c
x2 = (3/2) 6 = 9
x = 3
This is the same result that the more lengthy solution yielded.
--Jerry
* Or put another way, with eyes at ground level, the earth will show curvature of 6 ft over the span of 3 miles.
That's 8" per mile squared.
Scott wrote:The only thing that would make you more insane than believing this jibberish, would be wasting all this time to make people just think you're insane
You're not sharp enough to realize that you have never shown ANY proof of your globe.
Never.
lol
You've posted some things in the past, puffed out your chest, and acted as if you've shown something.
I have repeatedly shown you that what you have shown as ---> proof <--- of your globe is not proof at all.
You've shown NOTHING -- other than that you are a gullible sheep.
If I am the dumb guy, why is it still so very difficult for you (and all the others here) to simply PROVE your globe?
It should be a piece of cake for you.
Where's your proof?
Your empty-handed and your skull is also -----> EMPTY.
John 17:17 Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.
Genesis 1:6-7, 14-18 [6] And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
[7] And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
[14] And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
[15] And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
[16] And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
[17] And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
[18] And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.
John 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
You've heard the truth, and you've heard it from me.
Scott wrote:wasting all this time to make people just think you're insane
Most of what I have done since this topic began is RESPOND to people.
Mostly.
The topic is very valid and it is not unusual now in 2017.
Look around on the web.
Fact is, many many people have caught on, and from what I see, most smart people are very quick to recognize that there is something very wrong with the globe model.
Very very wrong.
And if someone can't look at NASA's ridiculous lies, fakery, and bullshit -- and scrutinize the moon landings, etc., and see how laffable it is, well... they are just not very sharp.
Do you honestly think they took that can up to the moon and landed it there 6 times?
LOL
Dude, they can't even show you a rocket going up to space, let alone to the friggin' moon.
You just happen to be slow, Scott.
You're not in the smart category.
88 wrote: we heard "HOLD!, HOLD!, HOLD!" on the mission control feed. It was from the range officer, and he said that an airplane had been detected downrange.
I think they should have shot it off anyway.....I mean how cool would it be to be riding in a 737 and have an Atlas rocket go whizzing by the left side of the plane watching it bounce on the firmament then crashing below probably killing hundreds?
Vogel wrote:8 (inch per mile, approx) x 70.14 x 70.14 = 39,357 inches
Wow, the earth curves at a rate of 8 inches (approx) per mile squared.
Who knew??
LOL at Dunce x infinity x infinity
Dunce wrote:Interesting.
8 inches is about .67 feet.
.67 * 1 mile = .67, or 8"
So at 2 miles, it's .67 * .67 = ~.45
3 miles - .67 * .67 * .67 = .3
Sounds like a pretty motherfucking stupid formula.
Vogel wrote:LOL
Dunce, it's MILES squared, not 8" (.67 of a foot) squared.
8" per mile squared.
I only repeated this a couple of dozen times on this board.
.67 (of a ft) x 3 miles x 3 miles = 6.03 ft.
Eyes at ground level, expected earth curvature over a 3 mile span is 6 ft
C'mon, Dunce.
1. Mathematically, your credibility is shot. Gone, Zero. You crapped the bed in EPCOT fashion. All can see it.
2. But you come in again claiming I am the moron.
Freaking OUT standing.
3. I've now posted at least 6 links all verifying that earth curvature on YOUR globe is 8" (approx.) per mile squared. I could probably easily find many more verifying it.
4. I've asked you multiple times (and I've asked others multiple times, also) to tell me what the real curvature rate is. I mean, since I am wrong and am the moron, the 6 links are all wrong. NASA's David Stern is wrong. And you are the smart guy.
lol
5. You sputter, call me names and produce -----> NOTHING.
NOTHING.
6. Duncedale is a mess[/Trump]
What is the earth curvature rate on YOUR globe, Duncedale?