Weeding out the affiliation thread

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:03 pm

Hapday wrote:Independant.

Obviously Canada needs to institute some sort of "no child left behind".

Mainiac · Post by **Mainiac** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:07 pm

Mikey wrote:
Hapday wrote:Independant.
Obviously Canada needs to institute some sort of "no child left behind".

Or in the case of Hap, "No Brain Left Behind".

Hapday · Post by **Hapday** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 5:40 pm

I see you two are bringing your 'A' game this morning. Props.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 6:30 pm

90 plus views and only 13 votes?

Rock the vote, people!

trev · Post by **trev** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 6:32 pm

I voted. Come on Republicans, VOTE.

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 6:38 pm

Independent.

Have voted for candidates in both major parties.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 6:54 pm

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 6:55 pm

Dem.

Poverty is more important than killing Arabs. Says so in the Bible, but those parts have been ignored by the moral majority.

Taking care of God's earth is more important than excluding gays. Says so in the Bible, but those parts have been ignored by the moral majority.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 7:10 pm

CLEAR?

BTW....Did I somehow miss the B's vote? :wink: uh just askin

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 7:17 pm

Sudden Sam wrote:Independent as hell. Vote across party lines regularly. Consider myself a Libertarian in most respects, but won't align myself with anyone.

^^^^What sam said

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 7:41 pm

But CM, you live in a Blue State.

Can't find a "Blue State Conservative" button?

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:04 pm

Bacefelice wrote:Dem.

Poverty is more important than killing Arabs.

Maybe, but it's not nearly as much fun

Vote GUNS & DOPE PARTY

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:06 pm

Just ordered em Mikey...front and back

Mainiac · Post by **Mainiac** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:50 pm

Hapday wrote:I see you two are bringing your 'A' game this morning. Props.

Just especially for you. Don't you feel noticed? :D

Hapday · Post by **Hapday** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:00 pm

Mainiac wrote:
Hapday wrote:I see you two are bringing your 'A' game this morning. Props.
Just especially for you. Don't you feel noticed? :D

My mom always said I was 'special' and today proves it.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:41 pm

ChargerMike wrote:

FTFY

Oh, and how the fuck do you THINK I voted. The Dems may not be the best option, but they are the only viable one.

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:06 pm

Marxist.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:23 pm

BSmack wrote:Oh, and how the fuck do you THINK I voted. The Dems may not be the best option, but they are the only viable one.

Uh.. not according to the majority of people in America :wink:

Mainiac · Post by **Mainiac** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:38 pm

BSmack wrote:
ChargerMike wrote:
FTFY

That deserveth a RACK!

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:19 pm

I think I hurt the goat fucker's feelings. They seem awful quiet. :wink:

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 12:06 am

BSmack wrote:I think I hurt the goat fucker's feelings. They seem awful quiet. :wink:

IndyFrisco doesn't post in this forum, Idiot

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 12:14 am

mothster wrote:moderate republican

yes its lonely

You're not alone.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 1:25 am

Moderate tree hugging commie.

Cueball · Post by **Cueball** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 1:45 am

Registered Dem, will vote across aisle when appropriate

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 5:21 am

Is fiscally conservative social moderate an option?

Ang · Post by **Ang** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:08 am

Last time I looked at the dictionary, one of the meanings for viable is:

"Capable of success or continuing effectiveness"

Whether or not you believe in what the Democratic party and their candidates stand for, I don't see viability as one of their strengths at this moment in time.

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:15 am

Ang wrote:Whether or not you believe in what the Democratic party and their candidates stand for, I don't see viability as one of their strengths at this moment in time.

By all means, stop taking a stand for what you believe is right. Get a little more wishy-washy, would ya?

TIA

Ang · Post by **Ang** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:28 am

I have to apologize, am new here and getting used to the forum and had a couple of windows open and put that specific reply to someone in a political discussion referring to "democrats as a viable party" in this one by mistake. It wasn't meant for a reply here.

So, to really answer the question in this forum since I put my foot in accidentally, I am a Republican. I thought for many years I was a Libertarian, voted that way for a long time and still do when I have the option. But in the present political landscape where we all need to be red or blue, I'm red.

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:02 am

mvscal wrote:
Dr_Phibes wrote:Marxist.
How quaint.

Exactly. Maybe this fuckstain can give everybody a review on how "The Killing Fields" was just Hollywood propaganda.

mothster · Post by **mothster** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 3:36 pm

KC Scott wrote:Is fiscally conservative social moderate an option?

yes---

rudy, ahhhnold

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 3:49 pm

mothster wrote:
KC Scott wrote:Is fiscally conservative social moderate an option?
yes---

rudy, ahhhnold

They've got a word for those guys.

RHINO

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:28 pm

BSmack wrote:They've got a word for those guys.

Yep..."majority"

KYOAA

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:02 pm

ChargerMike wrote:
BSmack wrote:They've got a word for those guys.
Yep..."majority"

KYOAA

Face it Mike, if Rudy or Ahnold were in red states, they would be Democrats. They're Republicans because they wanted to advance their careers.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:28 pm

^^^^^^^^^^^

Naw....they represent the Moderate and Liberal wing of the party no question, however I'd say it's a bit of a stretch to read anymore into it than that. I'd say it's a better bet that Maria will change affiliations before Ahhhhnold. JMO

See You Next Wednesday · Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:36 pm

I think Reagan is the best President in my lifetime and W is the worst. Were does that put me?

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:56 pm

See You Next Wednesday wrote:I think Reagan is the best President in my lifetime and W is the worst. Were does that put me?

Half right....

Hapday · Post by **Hapday** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:09 pm

See You Next Wednesday wrote:I think Reagan is the best President in my lifetime and W is the worst. Were does that put me?

A lot closer to reality than a majority of Democrats.

KatMode · Post by **KatMode** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:44 pm

Independent.

I refuse to contribute to the "your group, my group" bullshit mentality that occurs with the Democrats and Republicans. I vote on how I feel about issues, and whomever represents my views the best gets my vote.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:01 pm

Don't see myself voting Dem any time soon.

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 11:09 pm

RadioFan wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Dr_Phibes wrote:Marxist.
How quaint.
Exactly. Maybe this fuckstain can give everybody a review on how "The Killing Fields" was just Hollywood propaganda.

So Pol Pot was a Marxist? Get a fucking grip.

He mumbled a few Marxist phrases in order to obtain help from China in the mid-late seventies. I think you'll find most of the deaths in Phnom Penh were the responsibility of the Americans.

Oh and sorry to break this to you, but Star Wars wasn't real either.