Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21006
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10667
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Did she have tits?
I could never tell.
I could never tell.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Bill in Houston
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2020 12:29 am
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Perhaps the civil war begins now
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
It already started Buttfuck Bill, try to keep up.
Hope you enjoy your shit sandwich.
Hope you enjoy your shit sandwich.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21669
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
So is Donny and Mitch gonna Jan another justice down the dems throat?
Hope so.
They’d do the same if they had the chance.
I suspect he’ll drop a name this coming week.
The dems will cry, but who fukking cares?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hope so.
They’d do the same if they had the chance.
I suspect he’ll drop a name this coming week.
The dems will cry, but who fukking cares?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Yes. They have to. Plus I'm sure it will be good for another round of rioting and blue city burning. Win-win.smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:59 am So is Donny and Mitch gonna Jan another justice down the dems throat?
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Have to.mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:18 amYes. They have to. Plus I'm sure it will be good for another round of rioting and blue city burning. Win-win.smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:59 am So is Donny and Mitch gonna Jan another justice down the dems throat?
Like Pedokkkal has to run for cover for weeks at a time.
Civil War: translation, if we can’t kill people and fuck them over anymore then we will just burn the place down.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
After what happened to Garland, if the Nazis push thru a Justice and the Ds take the WH and Senate it is time to pack the court. I think we need 12 oracles.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21006
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21669
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
PR statehood could be a thing.
DC would take a Constitutional Amendment.
I believe the same applies to court packing.
If you fukk a want to keep Justices on your end of the bench, how about you tell them when it’s time to hang it up.
If RBG cared about anything other than holding onto power for as long as she could, she’d have stepped down in about 2014. That would have assured another commie in her spot.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DC would take a Constitutional Amendment.
I believe the same applies to court packing.
If you fukk a want to keep Justices on your end of the bench, how about you tell them when it’s time to hang it up.
If RBG cared about anything other than holding onto power for as long as she could, she’d have stepped down in about 2014. That would have assured another commie in her spot.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21006
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
I am taking a lot of shit on another board for saying exactly this. Apparently you're not a good liberal if you say this.smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:42 pm If you fukk a want to keep Justices on your end of the bench, how about you tell them when it’s time to hang it up.
If RBG cared about anything other than holding onto power for as long as she could, she’d have stepped down in about 2014. That would have assured another commie in her spot.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
They would need the White House and filibuster proof majority in the Senate. So...pretty fucking unlikely assuming PR even wants to become a state.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
3rdScrew_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 5:28 pmI am taking a lot of shit on another board for saying exactly this. Apparently you're not a good liberal if you say this.smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:42 pm If you fukk a want to keep Justices on your end of the bench, how about you tell them when it’s time to hang it up.
If RBG cared about anything other than holding onto power for as long as she could, she’d have stepped down in about 2014. That would have assured another commie in her spot.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21669
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Huckleberry was on Fox this morning and summed up the whole situation pretty well.
The republicans are gonna jam another Justice up the dems ass for one simple reason.
Because they can.
And anyone who pretends that the Dems wouldn't do the same, were the situation reversed is completely full of shit.
He also pointed out that this all goes back to Harry Reid.
HE was the one who wiped his ass with the filibuster rule to stuff Obamacare up the Republican's shitpipe. HE set the precedent so the dems get to live with the consequences.
As for the Dems saying "If you do this, we'll stack the court", does anyone with a shred of brain activity not think the dems will do that and anything else they can get away with, anyway.
The bottom line here is that the Republicans are playing by the rules and using them to their full advantage. Compare this to the shameless attempted coup which is dems started 5 minutes after the election.
Fukk you assholes. The D is gonna win another one against you chumps.
It's kinda nice to see that you finally realized that your best game plan, healfcare and AGW is the way to go, so you are running back to it. But it's too late. Enough people in the middle are on to your attempted race war and other despicable shit. A lot of balck folks are tired of it and they don't give two fukks about AGW. They just want the cops to show up again in their neighborhood to get a handle on the out of control thugs.
The republicans are gonna jam another Justice up the dems ass for one simple reason.
Because they can.
And anyone who pretends that the Dems wouldn't do the same, were the situation reversed is completely full of shit.
He also pointed out that this all goes back to Harry Reid.
HE was the one who wiped his ass with the filibuster rule to stuff Obamacare up the Republican's shitpipe. HE set the precedent so the dems get to live with the consequences.
As for the Dems saying "If you do this, we'll stack the court", does anyone with a shred of brain activity not think the dems will do that and anything else they can get away with, anyway.
The bottom line here is that the Republicans are playing by the rules and using them to their full advantage. Compare this to the shameless attempted coup which is dems started 5 minutes after the election.
Fukk you assholes. The D is gonna win another one against you chumps.
It's kinda nice to see that you finally realized that your best game plan, healfcare and AGW is the way to go, so you are running back to it. But it's too late. Enough people in the middle are on to your attempted race war and other despicable shit. A lot of balck folks are tired of it and they don't give two fukks about AGW. They just want the cops to show up again in their neighborhood to get a handle on the out of control thugs.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10667
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
How fascinating!smackaholic wrote:The bottom line here is that the Republicans are playing by the rules and using them to their full advantage. Compare this to the shameless attempted coup which is dems started 5 minutes after the election.
Turn off FAUX NEWS.
Take back your mind.
Give it a shot.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
There’s nothing in the Constitution that requires a certain number of Justices on the S.C. Right now 13 seems like a pretty good number.
- FiatLux
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 3793
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:51 am
- Location: San Francisco--The edge of the western world
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Has anyone seen a picture of suckoholic's wife ?
If so, abortion would be obsolete.
One of the scariest heifers I've ever seen.
If so, abortion would be obsolete.
One of the scariest heifers I've ever seen.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21669
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Wife smack from you?
I'll take that as a compliment.
Let's see a pic of yours.
Wonder if the Mrs Fiatlux is a left or right hand?
I'll take that as a compliment.
Let's see a pic of yours.
Wonder if the Mrs Fiatlux is a left or right hand?
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21669
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
So anyone can just bump it up to get their majority then?Mikey wrote:There’s nothing in the Constitution that requires a certain number of Justices on the S.C. Right now 13 seems like a pretty good number.
Is there anything you Marxists won’t do to get control?
Can they decide there are too many and shitcan a few?
All of this could have been avoided had the filibuster rule not been fukked with.
Thanks Harry.
Looks like it’s mob rule from here on out, I guess, until these gangsters gain enough of a hold to stop pretending to be dictators and make it official.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
You really should be tested for a serious case of myopia.
I’m not generally in favor of “packing” the SC but, if your Dear Leader and his chelonian little Caporegime succeed in ramming this appointment through, it would be completely justified and I hope they do it.
Now that the Dumpster has heard of the concept, likely for the first time, I expect he’s probably trying to figure out a way to do it himself. If the knuckledraggers somehow keep the White House and their Senate majority I fully expect him to start pushing appointment of a couple dozen Tom Cotton clones by the end of November.
I’m not generally in favor of “packing” the SC but, if your Dear Leader and his chelonian little Caporegime succeed in ramming this appointment through, it would be completely justified and I hope they do it.
Now that the Dumpster has heard of the concept, likely for the first time, I expect he’s probably trying to figure out a way to do it himself. If the knuckledraggers somehow keep the White House and their Senate majority I fully expect him to start pushing appointment of a couple dozen Tom Cotton clones by the end of November.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
A few years ago I caught a look at my dick in the mirror and noticed it was browned up on one side. Wtf? I realized I had been flogging myself so much that I built up a permanent bruise. I said then and there that I needed to even it out. I mean, what if I had to go to the doctor and he asked me why my dick was brown only on one side?smackaholic wrote:Wonder if the Mrs Fiatlux is a left or right hand?
So even though it was uncomfortable, I started shanking myself with the other hand for a while. Then after I while I changed the rotation so that Monday is a right hand jerk day. Tuesday is a left hand jerk day. And so on. Now my dick is brownish all over and it looks like the dick of a Mexican. But it is all the same color so I am cool with that.
I know how to problem solve.
smackaholic wrote:I would touch someone's dick, hell, I'd fukking blow him
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21669
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Rack you Slap, for figuring it out.
I have become pretty good at switch hitting myself since the advent of free interwebs pron.
I find that left handed dick beating is easier than LH mouse/keyboard clacking.
Hell, it’s gotten to the point that i have to going southpaw no longer feels like someone else is jerking it.
How many other switch hitters we got in the house?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have become pretty good at switch hitting myself since the advent of free interwebs pron.
I find that left handed dick beating is easier than LH mouse/keyboard clacking.
Hell, it’s gotten to the point that i have to going southpaw no longer feels like someone else is jerking it.
How many other switch hitters we got in the house?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
You are an idiot. There is no reversing this. The D’s would have voted on the R’s “Garland” and this whole situation would never have happened. More evidence of this will be supplied in the future when the D’s roll over for their corporate masters yet again and don’t block RBG’s seatholder from being a Dumpster and then don’t pack the courts if given a chance.smackaholic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:13 am And anyone who pretends that the Dems wouldn't do the same, were the situation reversed is completely full of shit.
They should threaten to add Her to the court when they pack it.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Yes that is the rules which you just said were ok for the R’s but the other side is Marxists who will do anything to gain power.smackaholic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 1:32 pmSo anyone can just bump it up to get their majority then?Mikey wrote:There’s nothing in the Constitution that requires a certain number of Justices on the S.C. Right now 13 seems like a pretty good number.
Is there anything you Marxists won’t do to get control?
Fuck you you stupid orange fuck.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
But...but...but
Harry Reid!!!
Obaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!
Benghaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Harry Reid!!!
Obaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!
Benghaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Allegedly...
sin 2016
So you won't have a problem with the new Democratic President and Senate appointing another four to the Supreme Court next year?
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Shedick has no idea how the Constitution works. He just knows he is a scared little cuck and the Faux Blonde told him it’s because of pinkos.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
They would have the right to expand the court if they choose to.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Problem would be eliminated if they term limited the mother fuckers instead of waiting until they are a stinking senile corpse sitting on the bench. Male or female.
The idea of 87 year olds or older making SCOTUS decisions is ludicrous.
The idea of 87 year olds or older making SCOTUS decisions is ludicrous.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Assuming he rolls that way. Probably is just jonesing for some head off Queerland or Screwy so they can sing the praises of Biden Octoberfest style.smackaholic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 11:56 am Wife smack from you?
I'll take that as a compliment.
Let's see a pic of yours.
Wonder if the Mrs Fiatlux is a left or right hand?
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21669
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
I think we can find some bipartisanship in the idea of senile people in important government roles.
It's a shame the dems are running one for the top spot.
It would be nice if we could have a little bit of sanity and carved in stone rules.
Here are a few.....
Retirement age of 70....,.for all federal elected officials.
All nominees presented by the Prez get a speedy vote within 2 weeks of pic. No more Kavanaugh witch hunt shit shows.
70 votes needed for first nominee. Lower numbers for 2nd or 3rd in the event that the minority party thinks it can simply veto everyone. Of course, the majority party could play cute with such a rule by intentionally voting against initial pics, so this gets a little tricky.
9 justices. No more.
The idea that the ruling party can simply pack their way to a majority is stupid. We've been pretty good at avoiding, other than that time FDR thought he'd pack his way to a socialist utopia.
It's time for a Constitutional Convention to settle this and a few other things that have been debated forever such as WTF does "regulated militia" mean or the horrible Roe V Wade decision.
BTW, if you bother to read Roe, it's actually a pretty sensible compromise.
Would have made a good law. But Judges aren't supposed to make laws. They are supposed to follow them.
And last but not least, we need to move the 10th Amendment up a little in the rankings to maybe 3. If we simply start following it, fully, we might find that we could stop this coming civil war over who is in charge, because it really wouldn't matter much.
DC's role could get back to international affairs and not a hell of a lot else.
You want single payer?
Do it at the state or local level.
Wanna build a buncha fukkin' bird killers or magic shade trees?
The same applies.
It's a shame the dems are running one for the top spot.
It would be nice if we could have a little bit of sanity and carved in stone rules.
Here are a few.....
Retirement age of 70....,.for all federal elected officials.
All nominees presented by the Prez get a speedy vote within 2 weeks of pic. No more Kavanaugh witch hunt shit shows.
70 votes needed for first nominee. Lower numbers for 2nd or 3rd in the event that the minority party thinks it can simply veto everyone. Of course, the majority party could play cute with such a rule by intentionally voting against initial pics, so this gets a little tricky.
9 justices. No more.
The idea that the ruling party can simply pack their way to a majority is stupid. We've been pretty good at avoiding, other than that time FDR thought he'd pack his way to a socialist utopia.
It's time for a Constitutional Convention to settle this and a few other things that have been debated forever such as WTF does "regulated militia" mean or the horrible Roe V Wade decision.
BTW, if you bother to read Roe, it's actually a pretty sensible compromise.
Would have made a good law. But Judges aren't supposed to make laws. They are supposed to follow them.
And last but not least, we need to move the 10th Amendment up a little in the rankings to maybe 3. If we simply start following it, fully, we might find that we could stop this coming civil war over who is in charge, because it really wouldn't matter much.
DC's role could get back to international affairs and not a hell of a lot else.
You want single payer?
Do it at the state or local level.
Wanna build a buncha fukkin' bird killers or magic shade trees?
The same applies.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
And when Republicans take back control, they would have the right to shrink the court. LIFO.
Yeah, it's a pretty stupid game to play and that's assuming you will even be in a position to play it.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
I would have buttered Ruth Bader's ass crack back in that day.
smackaholic wrote:I would touch someone's dick, hell, I'd fukking blow him
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21006
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg--tits up
Says the guy sucking the dick of the turtle that fired the first shot. Get used to every R POTUS being impeached you kid diddling weirdo.